Openminded or Closedminded?

About this video – Talks – Jonathan Haidt on the moral roots of liberals and conservatives.

It is difficult to compare the merits of conservatism and liberalism because value judgments are divisive by nature. Jonathan Haidt argues that we can avoid this argument because these seemingly conflicting values actually compliment each other (yin and yang). This is another way of saying that we ought to avoid extremes and strive to find balance.

My biggest problem with staunch conservatism is that we appear to live in an emergent universe in which change is the only constant. Evolution implies constant adaptation. A flexible branch can move with the wind, but a rigid one will break.

One who is resistant to change will eventually find him or herself out of synch with his or her environment. If conservatives sometimes feel their values are under attack, they may be experiencing the effects of dynamic forces pushing against ideas that belong to another time.

About Jonathan Haidt

Psychologist Jonathan Haidt studies the five moral values that form the basis of our political choices, whether we’re left, right or center. In this eye-opening talk, he pinpoints the moral values that liberals and conservatives tend to honor most.

He  studies morality and emotion in the context of culture. He asks: Why did humans evolve to have morals — and why did we all evolve to have such different morals, to the point that our moral differences may make us deadly enemies? It’s a question with deep repercussions in war and peace — and in modern politics, where reasoned discourse has been replaced by partisan anger and cries of  “You just don’t get it!”

Haidt asks, “Can’t we all disagree more constructively?” He suggests we might build a more civil and productive discourse by understanding the moral psychology of those we disagree with, and committing to a more civil political process. He’s also active in the study of positive psychology and human flourishing.

http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf

Openness to experience

“Open individuals have an affinity for liberal, progressive, left-wing political views — they like a society which is open and changing — whereas closed individuals prefer conservative, traditional, right-wing views.”

The five foundations of morality are:

  1. harm  /  care
  2. fairness / reciprocity
  3. in group loyalty
  4. authority/ respect
  5. purity / sanctity

A lot of the problems we have to solve are problems that require us to change other people. And if you want to change other people, a much better way to do it is to first understand who we are — understand our moral psychology, understand that we all think we’re right — and then step out – even if it’s just for a moment, step out — check in with Seng-ts’an.

Step out of the moral matrix, just try to see it as a struggle playing out in which everybody does think they’re right, and everybody, at least, has some reasons — even if you disagree with them — everybody has some reasons for what they’re doing.

Step out. And if you do that, that’s the essential move to cultivate moral humility, to get yourself out of this self-righteousness, which is the normal human condition. Think about the Dalai Lama. Think about the enormous moral authority of the Dalai Lama — and it comes from his moral humility.

Learn more about Jonathan Haidt’s drive for a more productive and civil politics — and sign a pledge to engage in civil politics — on his website CivilPolitics.org And take an eye-opening quiz about your own morals at YourMorals.org

Who owns blog comments?

Don’t fence me in

When I was young I was a competitive, rugged individualist. I rejected the ‘parallel thinking’ and ‘lateral thinking’ approaches that I was naturally inclined towards using. My family members, school teachers and employers placed a strong reliance on competition, within a structured environment replete with rules and regulations.

I struggled to become a ‘linear’ thinker but I failed time and time again when my shadow self emerged. By the time I was thirty I recognized that I had been a square peg and that no amount of hammering will make my ‘self’ fit into a round hole. I became aware of who I really am and I set myself free.

I edit spelling errors, typos and awkward wording on posts and in forums. I frequently do so more than once because I do not always see clearly. I also edit what I have written when I think I have not expressed myself clearly. I do this because I believe that my words belong to me and, because I believe I have the right to edit or even delete them, until someone else posts into the same post or forum thread. After that occurs IMHO any changes ought to be made in follow-up comments made to the same thread so the conversation in the thread is not disjointed.

How many times have you heard this?

If you’re not prepared to let it stand, why did you post/publish/say it in the first place?

My response is that if I am to be burdened with the rule of remaining silent, until after I have internally processed information, and taken a position on any given issue then, you will never experience the best of me. This is why. Continue reading